| Sarko president |
[May. 6th, 2007|02:30 pm] |
Lots of separatists here in Quebec are disappointed Ms Royal didn't get elected president. Ironically, her mildly supportive statements in favour of Quebec helped torpedo her campaign.
If there's anyone looking at this through a smart gender/politics prism, I'd like to hear about it. My gut feel is that Sarko looked presidential while Royal didn't, and that it's next to impossible for a woman to remain in her gender role and act presidential. If sexes had been reversed, it would have been a slam-dunk for Royal.
There are some interesting news I wish I had more time to dig through. It was Le Pen's last dance, and I've no idea what will happen to France's now splintered extreme right-wing parties.
Since I like predicting the obvious: French politics are going to get weirder. The Socialist Party (Social Democrats) will slowly slide into irrelevance unless it really groks both the environment and civil liberties, aligning itself onto the 'bright green' school. The center party and the greens will duke it out for disenchanted voters, helped by openings to proportional representation. |
|
|
| Bank card fraud |
[Apr. 22nd, 2007|06:23 pm] |
This week it was my turn to have my card swiped. QOTD: "Oh, that's weird. There's already a deposit-only order on this card".
Also this week-end, my aunt was celebrating her 50th anniversary as a nun. I waited the table for the close family supper last night. As with each family reunion there's always a black sheep there to make some asinine comments. "It's in the Koran that all Catholics should be killed". "With Fortress North America, we could prevent all the Islamics from entering".
Remarkably, I managed to hold my tongue and avoided dropping plates or hot drinks. One uncle that usually tries to pick an argument noticed I wasn't arguing at all, a sign that I'm getting "better".
Today was the public reception. 50 people, mostly women with a median age of 70 were all there to celebrate my aunt's golden jubilee. All these women found me quite delightful. My reputation as a computer-fixer, waiter and my "You are here" t-shirt may have been to blame. I knew better than to wear the "Practice Safe Hex" t-shirt.
That's my life right now. No cash/bank card, 31, single, and really popular with nuns and older women. And getting "better" all the time. |
|
|
| Please don't sue me |
[Apr. 15th, 2007|02:58 pm] |
Dear Hon. Peter Van Loan, Minister for Democratic Reform,
I'm emailing you to make sure our government doesn't sue me.
Well, there's more. I ask that you to open up more civic data in Canada, including postal code data. This would benefit taxpayers by avoiding duplication in government departments. It would also avoid the disgraceful practice of misleading some Canadians as to who their elected representative is.
Let's start with the legal question. Is it illegal for me to copy a list of members of parliament from parliament's website? I made a copy after hearing a couple different (non-partisan) advocacy organizations had staffers copy and paste the database from web pages into their excel databases. You can find my list here:
http://lokobo.com:3000/mps
To import it into excel, you can obtain it as CSV: http://lokobo.com:3000/mps.csv
Several people have told me that this constitutes copyright infringement, although it seems to me a straightforward list of facts.
Once I had completed this list, I was asked for a function that retrieves a member of parliament for a postal code. (More precisely, something that returns a list of possible electoral districts ids for a postal code.) You can see that function here:
http://lokobo.com:3000/
Is that illegal? Again, straightforward facts. I'm not even redistributing a database or making any efforts to build an exhaustive one.
Advocacy organizations across the ideological spectrum use similar tools. Egale, Preserve Marriage, CLC, United Steel Workers, Automotive Industries Association's Consumer (Right to Repair campaign), Micah Challenge, Make Poverty History, CAHPERD, The True Voice, CNIB, all exhort supporters to "Contact your MP".
Some groups link to the parliament's website, others copy the information. The richest buy data from Statistics Canada. If we care about democracy, this information should be freely available to all. A government that spends millions encouraging citizens to vote in media campaigns can surely forgo a few thousands in licensing fees to make it easier for citizens to express concerns on policy issues.
Besides the cost to democracy, there are a couple other points worth considering.
-Elections Canada is not a customer of this product. They also buy a file from Canada Post, a crown corporation, duplicating the costs of development.
-The elections.ca website results seem less accurate than those on the parliament's website (which I hope was obtained from StatsCan rather than duplicated).
You can verify this for yourself by searching for 'H1T4C6' on http://www.elections.ca/scripts/pss/FindED.aspx
and comparing it to: http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/about/people/house/PostalCode.asp?Language=E&txtPostalCode=H1T4C6
Is it one or one of five possible MP's?
Making this data freely available in an open format is a great way to ensure citizens are given accurate information, to increase participation in our democratic process and reduce error-prone bureaucratic duplication.
I have copied some of your colleagues, hoping they will support you in changing policy on this matter before the next election is called. When every political party has a function to find their candidate by postal code, advocacy organizations should be entitled to the same.
Some of my colleagues want sites where a citizen could input their postal code to find all candidates in their riding, along with their programmes and other communications. It would be nice if we could do that without the threat of litigation.
I look forward to hearing from you.
----
Note: that parl.gc.ca link broke. It's now http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Compilations/HouseOfCommons/MemberByPostalCode.aspx?Language=E&Menu=HOC&PostalCode=H1T4C6
Dozens of advocacy groups in Canada had their links to the parliament website broken by this change. Sigh. |
|
|
| How can I email the honourable Fortier? |
[Apr. 1st, 2007|05:03 pm] |
So I want to email a complaint about the elections.ca website, about how finding out who your elected representative is error-prone. So I decide to look up who is minister of Public Works and Government Services. Here's the list of ministers.
Fortier, Michael (Hon.)
No link. Oh right, not an MP. Check conservative.ca. Hmm, no email. Check the ministry: no email, no address.
I guess maybe I should email the parliamentary secretary. You know, the one that actually won an election. |
|
|
| Politics is a lot like curling |
[Mar. 28th, 2007|08:32 pm] |
I might point out that the phrase "stealing votes" has become fairly common usage in election coverage. It does not usually carry the same meaning as its use more recently in U.S. political coverage.
In Canada, it usually means that a party has made gains in an area where another party expected to do well. I can't say definitively, but I suspect its a metaphor imported from sports. In curling, for instance, points gained as a result of a mistake by an opponent are routinely called 'stolen'. That is clearly the sense in which political analysts in Canada use the phrase. So that's what the talking heads meant: politics is like curling. |
|
|
| Quebec election results |
[Mar. 27th, 2007|09:49 pm] |
Almost everything went as expected. Liberals got a minority government, the ADQ is the opposition and the PQ is third by a few percentage points.
The green party did better than Quebec solidaire in overall vote. Their leader didn't get 10% of the vote in his own riding, and had a fairly negative campaign. They don't have any momentum.
Quebec Solidaire, the left-wing separatists did quite well, with both leaders placing second in their ridings of Gouin and Mercier.
The Liberals could pilfer the QS and Green agendas for popular policies. Instead they're ceding the ideological terrain to the right-wing ADQ by promising tax cuts.
If they don't get a better leader, expect the next election to produce an ADQ government, and the QS to continue gaining at the expense of Liberals and the Bloc. |
|
|
| Quebec elections today - nature hates a vacuum. |
[Mar. 26th, 2007|06:51 pm] |
Polls close in an hour. I'll definitely be watching the results tonight; it looks like Quebec might get its first minority government since 1878.
When a liberal political worker told me they were going to call an election because the PQ was down, I expressed concern. Tonight's results, if they are anything like opinion polls suggest may show the Liberal's decision was a strategic blunder.
The usual concerns with calling an early election is you look opportunistic, taking advantage of an unpopular leader. The PQ's leader keeps saying stupid things and generally shooting himself in the foot, so this might have appeared like perfect timing to call an election.
Unfortunately for the Liberals, they're not very popular themselves. Their performance is widely considered to be lackluster and Charest, well, lacks charisma.
If nature hates a vacuum, you can apply the same to politics. Instead of voting PQ or Liberal, many people are being swayed by the ADQ - Action Democratique du Quebec. Not quite as in-your-face about separation as the PQ and definitely more right-wing their success in the polls has surprised most pundits. Mario Dumont has been branded as a one-man show with no team to back him up, attacked from all sides - and still the ADQ goes up in the polls. Some have said they could go from third-party status to minority government.
The greens don't seem to be getting any traction, and the NDP barely exists. The party that surprised me the most and IS getting some traction is Quebec Solidaire. Their male spokesperson, Amir Khadir, has more charisma and speaking ability than the leaders of all the other parties put together. Thierry mentioned that in one radio debate, other leaders were at a loss for words and falling under his spell. I saw the same thing during his TV appearance on "Tout le Monde en Parle", which I think is Quebec's most watched TV show. Imagine someone on the left of the NDP having a Tory nod in agreement. Yeah, that good.
Some of his policies - getting more money for "national" resources like water and wind, saving money by re-negotiating with pharmaceuticals, bringing the minimum wage to $10 are quite popular. Today, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives published a report arguing for a minimum of $10/hr in 2005 dollars, indexed to inflation. "The Centre recently released an Environics Research poll showing 88% of Canadians support raising minimum wages to help reduce Canada’s growing income gap."
When savvy, charismatic lefties argue forcefully for policies that have that level of support, it's no surprise that their support increases. It also puts the right-wingers in a very tough position.
Tonight should be quite interesting. Quebec's -and Canada's- political future could change fairly radically. |
|
|
| Canadian MP Data, take 2 |
[Mar. 25th, 2007|05:22 pm] |
Yesterday I released a new feature on my Canadian MP data web service: MP lookup by postal code. It got some coverage on David Akin's blog and provoked some discussion on the civic access email list.
I'll be quite happy when this data is made freely available by government. Until then, I intend to run this web service for all those that need it at no cost and without usage restrictions.
Now if only transit data were as easy to obtain as MP data... |
|
|
| Conservative Pork |
[Mar. 24th, 2007|08:21 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | auto, canada, car, conservative, ctv, david+akin, global+warming, harper, ndp, politics | ] |
| [ | Current Location |
| | Quebec, QC, Canada | ] |
| [ | Current Music |
| | Moby - Down Slow | ] |
Conservatives have no shame. CTV's David Akin quotes Dennis Desrosiers:At $5,600 per tonne this policy has the dubious distinction of being even more expensive per tonne of GHG reduction than the previous record holder - the Conservatives' transit pass tax credit ($2,000 per tonne, because about 97% of the subsidy recipients were already daily transit riders). [in fact it’s] The most expensive environment program anywhere in the world by a wide margin. I wanted to defend this policy as visionary, an example of feebates / revenue-neutral tax shift. Sadly, it appears to be nothing but pork. Check out Transport Canada's listing of qualifying vehicles Who had the bright idea of giving the same $1000 subsidy for buying flex-fuel vehicles that get 12.3 L/100 km (19 miles per gallon) as well as normal cars getting 8.3-6.3 L/100 km (28-37)? Perhaps if those 'flex-fuel' vehicles were actually running on E85 fuel (which I understand isn't even available), they might have comparable CO2 emissions. Given the last-minute include of E85 vehicles and the proximity of the factory producing most of them to the minister responsible, it tastes of poorly cooked pork. Yummy.
What a program like this needs is some serious transparency. Audit auto-makers to get CO2 costs for building the car (the so-called 'embedded energy'), and calculate emissions for cars in CO2 per 100 km. A good formula might be the embedded CO2 / 10 + average yearly CO2 emissions for driving X km. This creates a clear, technology-agnostic metric for auto-makers and consumers alike. Plug-in hybrids, flex-fuel or even flex-fuel plug-ins: it doesn't matter what's under the hood, only what comes out of the tail-pipe.
I'll admit to really liking the idea of a tax shift. This program could have been revenue neutral, with the rebates being balanced out by the fees imposed on the dirtier vehicles. This has the added benefit of avoiding an unnecessary subsidy for cars and appearing 'fair' rather than a tax-grab. If there is a clear commitment to continuing this type of policy over time, it creates a strong incentive for companies to get their cars out of the gas-guzzler category, and continue R&D on efficient models.
The NDP wasn't fond of such approaches at first, but their policy play-book included the idea of a tax shift after the Green Party started getting better poll results. Many left-wingers oppose such a tax policy because it can penalize the poorest while subsidizing the rich (who can afford the more expensive hybrids). This time around however, the NDP complained that this program doesn't do enough to subsidize Canada's poor auto-makers. Sigh. As NDP Auto Industry Critic Brian Masse points out:“There is no change in the research and development tax credit. There is no financing program. There is no auto strategy, period. The Conservatives’ only strategy is distraction and avoidance of the real issues.” The NDP is not only completely off the mark, they miss an opportunity to call out Conservative incompetence and apparent pork, demonstrate a modicum of vision, and propose a policy that could actually provoke a change in our auto industry.
I'll want to check the Liberal and Green responses to this measure but it's a Saturday night, and I have a movie to watch :) |
|
|
| Canadian MP data |
[Mar. 18th, 2007|07:32 pm] |
I wonder if the government is going to sue me for copyright infringement. As they say on the website I got the information from:The material on this site is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act and related regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission.
The visitor should be aware that some of the material found on this site might be subject to copyright held by third parties.
It is the sole responsibility of the visitor to determine the copyright of the content and to obtain all necessary permissions. If publishing the list of MPs with their contact information is somehow illegal, we're definitely not living in a democracy. I didn't ask permission because I don't think I should have to.
Make Poverty History had a campaign asking people to call their MP. Sadly, the email did not include the MP's phone number - even though they know who the MP is. There was no public database they knew of that had a list of MPs with their corresponding data. Through civicaccess.ca I heard of other organizations and similar cases, so I decided I would compile the information. That database now exists, and is in the public domain (as long as I don't sued!):
http://lokobo.com:3000/mps
download a CSV version at http://lokobo.com:3000/mps.csv
The source code for retrieving the information and the website is also public domain:
http://rubyforge.org/projects/mp-ca-scraper/
(Geeks don't copy and paste information from websites into spreadsheets. Oh, no! We take twice the time, and use programming tools. And publish the whole thing as open source.)
(Comments deleted because of a deluge of spam. Project is offline, code is still up for anyone that wants to take it over. Let me know in private if you do, I'll update this post) |
|
|
| Do the smug thing |
[Jan. 31st, 2007|07:51 am] |
Such was the title of a blog post by Michael Arrington dissing a new site called dotherightthing.com
It illustrates perfectly why I am getting really, really tired of politics. We're not having dialogs, only parallel monologues.
Beyond that, there's a whole new set of political questions where they interact with new technology. The mode of production is changing. The mode of production is changing. The mode of production is changing. No, seriously, it's that important: the last time that happened, the world got communism and fascism, slavery was abolished and women got the vote. The mode of production is changing. What changes come next?
In My Language takes autism advocacy in a different direction, helped by new technology. New issues are coming up, or being redefined. The conservation politics of the first industrialist isn't the same as the 70's anti-pesticide movement, or today's bright green movement.
As I listen to political speeches, I'm amazed not at how much of what people like Bush junior say are outright lies, deceit and fabrications, but at how much is utterly irrelevant for being stuck in the past. Social security cuts, tax cuts to boost consumption, barriers on borders - blah, blah, blah. |
|
|
| The people/things that really get on my nerves are... |
[Nov. 17th, 2006|01:24 pm] |
I got asked this, and thought I'd post my response here too:Politicians that lack vision, humanity or logic. There are some awful people, but politicians are the only ones that want to speak for me.
So when you have some dim-wit going to war for democracy, gutting Kyoto for clean air, or stopping the threat of gay marriage to save the family... I want to send them back to grade 9 to read some Orwell. In other news, I'm getting cabin-fever, so I guess it's a good thing that I've no food left. |
|
|
| worldchanging: the book |
[Oct. 29th, 2006|06:58 pm] |
November 1st is a good time to buy it.
This book could be incredibly important. Most activism isn't fun, creative or smart enough. If we've discussed issues of social change, chances are I mentioned the worldchanging.com website because their solutions are more optimistic, and quite different from the draining activism we've come to know.
I'll be buying several copies of the book. If you'd like to discuss it over the holidays, I can lend you a copy. Please let me know through comments or email.
Also, if you have any advice on how to conduct a discussion on a book this important, please comment. Thanks! |
|
|
| Greening politics |
[Oct. 24th, 2006|10:41 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | canada, conservative, environment, layton, liberal, nuclear, oil, politics, sierra+club, sustainability | ] |
| [ | Current Location |
| | Dartmouth, NS, Canada | ] |
A couple weeks ago I got bulk mail from Jack Layton about the NDP's green policy. It looked good, and I've been meaning to take a closer look. Here's some thoughts on the subject, with some comments on how we can push a consensus that can reach to both the left and right in Canada.
Before Elizabeth May became leader of the Green Party, the Sierra Club released an analysis of the environmental platforms of the different political parties. This time the Greens come out slightly ahead, with 97 points to the NDP's 91. The Liberals, Bloc and Conservatives trail with 53, 46 and 31.
I have two main problems with the SCC's (Sierra Club of Canada) approach. First, it relies on promises rather than record. Second, it's a "laundry list" that doesn't reveal what the critical steps are that must be taken. No doubt they would argue that all the things on their list have to be done.
Sill, a vague promise to "increase funding for science in environmental departments" is worth 3 points, the same amount of credit that you can get by cutting the $163 million a year in subsidies to Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), or the obscene amount (over a billion a year) to feed the profitable oil extractors.
If I was a politician, I could be getting all those easy credits and doing everything possible to avoid pissing off Big Oil. Don't get me wrong. I'm glad the Sierra Club is documenting all this, and pleased they want to spend more money on scientists. I just want to keep politicians far more accountable, and force them to actually take tough decisions.
In the last federal election, the SCC had given the NDP a higher mark than the Greens. It seemed like a genuine shame to me, because the Green party then had transformative proposals. The ideas of tax shifting are now part of the NDP's platforms. The idea is simple: tax bads, not goods. Income and employment are good, pollution is bad; decrease taxes on the first, make it up on pollution taxes.
A few years ago, this was a political taboo, considered regressive and too market-driven. Yes, if we cut subsidies to oil companies we will have to do something to address increased costs for people on fixed incomes. Still, subsidizing Shell is no way to keep grandma warm this winter. And it's something both the right and left-wingers should be able agree on.
The Liberal and Conservative parties are the only ones that are not calling for an end to subsidies to the AECL and oil companies.
These Conservatives are a pretty funny bunch sometimes. They want to scrap the Wheat Board because they favour free and unimpeded markets. They cut a wasteful $5 million on Status of Women. And then they give 300 times more to their rich friends. Eeewww. What's that smell?
Over a billion dollars to oil companies, a hundred million to nuclear. If enough attention is brought to bear on this issue, politicians will have to cut the subsidies. It's against the right-wing pro-market ideology. It's offensive to those who hate big oil or think it's making enough money not to need federal cash. And it's offensive to those who would prefer seeing this money spent on solutions to climate change.
This could be the acid test, how we could tell who is simply checking off items on a cheap laundry list and who gets the big picture.
I wonder how much pressure would be needed for this to pass. |
|
|
| On Peter MacKay, and how Layton missed an opportunity |
[Oct. 22nd, 2006|07:52 pm] |
Paint me a cynical bastard, but I'm guessing he didn't refer to Belinda Stronach as a dog. At least not for the recent incident he's accused of.
The Speaker didn't hear it, and couldn't make it out in the recordings. He should be innocent until *proven* guilty. So let's consider for a second that he is innocent. What does that mean?
Well, he's still a sexist asshole. That's why the allegations seem credible. The comments he made about walking his dog after he went back to the family farm implicitly compared Stronach to a dog. And telling Alexa McDonough she should be knitting... there's a clear pattern of sexist remarks. He still needs to apologize to Canadians, and especially Canadian women. In particular, he owes McDonough a public apology.
What's equally distressing is that the Liberals could be lying about this, just to score political points. They know MacKay is a sitting duck, and won't even be prime minister. Still, he'd be a high-profile "kill", and any outrage by women directed at the conservatives help them. That Liberals would pretend to have heard MacKay's remarks would be no more surprising than MacKay actually having made a canine reference.
Jack Layton may be falling in a trap. Instead of following the Liberal strategy and calling for an apology, he could be taking the high road. The comments made about McDonough are on the record, and there has been no apology. The cuts to Status of Women are proof of an anti-woman bias, and should be reversed. By bringing back the discussion to proven events and policy, he would shine in contrast to the Liberals' personal attacks and allegations.
Fundamentally, I believe it's that point-scoring that makes politics so toxic, especially for women and minorities. We need leaders that will rise above that. |
|
|
| Goofy egalitarians |
[Aug. 4th, 2006|06:51 pm] |
So Jonathan and I are discussing ways to use the internets to build communities. "Have you checked out LETS?" He hasn't, so I go dig out a link for him. Hey, there's a local LETS I've been meaning to check out.
I had a hard time with some of the ideology:Is everybody’s hour of work worth the same?We have been taught to think that teachers should be paid less than bankers, that store clerks are worth less than psychiatrists, that farm work is less valuable than office work.
But we all need each other to make the Halifax economy function. Everyone’s honest hour of labour has the same dignity. Nonetheless, it is up to the individuals trading their time and effort to put a value on it. In an ideal world, most hours of labour would be worth one Salty, but the fact is that some people might want two or three or more Salty for their hour of work. Valuing equally the services of a Pasteur and a Reiki "master" seems very, very wrong. At least as wrong as paying an 18 year old a million dollars a year to play hockey.
Which adds more value to our lives, a store clerk or a psychiatrist? If you could do either, how are you most likely to do the most good for society? Now, is this only because "We have been taught to think" this way? Maybe I wouldn't be so brainwashed if I wore my reflector beanie...
I've heard people complain that checkout clerks are essential to a grocery business, but not the store managers. When we invent store manager machines, I'll believe that. Right now, the automated checkouts machines are winning.
The economy functions because we have some people that produce far more than others. I'm all for more economic egalitarianism, but instead of exhortations to pay people the same wage, maybe we should answer how we will value those who contribute disproportionately to the economy and society.
Take doctors, for example. Right now, we value them mainly through money. Certainly, anyone else working 120 hours a week would demand better finances, because it's obvious we don't respect these people enough to give them a lifestyle that could be considered healthy. 60 hours a week with a reasonable salary, even if you have to be an intern for four years: you could still put in that time to become expert in your domain while having a life. Saying "let's try to be paid the same" while not looking at all the ways we express recognition is an added insult to those whose market rates don't reflect the societal value of their work.
The problem with idealists is the most vocal ones are so naive. The way we value work is certainly flawed. We just can't fix this until we recognize that some work can be more valuable than others. |
|
|
| Toronto Star uses Wikipedia as authoritative source |
[Jul. 31st, 2006|01:55 pm] |
Ok, so the Liberal leadership race isn't the most fascinating topic. Still, check out this Toronto Star article: Liberal frontrunners emerge - "Different camps are monitoring Wikipedia updates".Some 900 MPs, senators, past candidates, riding presidents and assorted other party brass are automatically entitled to vote at the Liberals' December leadership convention. Wikipedia is tracking their endorsements. Candidates say it's accurate, and at least the Toronto Star is using this list.
How's that for validation? |
|
|
| Show the truth |
[Jul. 20th, 2006|10:39 pm] |
Audra posted about Show the truth, asking what should be done about their visit to Halifax. This won't be the first time I weigh in on a similar topic (see her post on John Hetherington. I recognized those tactics and encouraged her to dig further).
Having spent a long time discussing with both pro-life and pro-choice people, I've seen some pretty disturbing tactics (on both sides). As a single white guy, I still feel a wee self-conscious weighing in on this debate. My refusal to take a public stance on this has angered some in the past. Let's just say I'm neither anti-life nor anti-choice, ok? :)
Enough caveats.
I did a bit of research, and found out these guys have been around a long, long time. Campaign Life Coalition mentioned them in both June and November 1997. (Aside: Ironically, the coalition mentions the Council of Canadians with Disabilities in that same edition, a voice I wish we had heard more clearly. Tracy Latimer was murdered by a psychotic father afraid of needles, and courts and media all showered him with pity).
Show the truth ("STT") gets mentioned by several groups, including some who commit crimes against the web (can you believe these colour and font choices!?). One of the most recent mentions a 2004 legal decision ruling that the display of abortion images was free speech.
Most of the mainstream pro-life groups are not pursuing strategies like STT. Given they are already isolated and seen to be fringe, I think a few options could serve the pro-choice advocates. Audra also mentioned that those are late-stage abortions, but even if some of the images are legit it's a slippery slope of a debate.
AFAIK, the current abortion debate is access to emergency contraception and/or morning-after pills, and that's what I'd bring it back to. "The STT photos are unnecessarily graphic, and not relevant to the current debate about morning-after pills" is the best way I can think of engaging on that issue. It's a response that sidesteps the emotional appeal, stays on message and can't be argued by even the most ardent pro-lifers. The real debate has moved a long time ago, and they know it. |
|
|
| FOIPOP: Case on the 4th of July |
[Jun. 29th, 2006|07:09 pm] |
Update on the city council's district boundary case: My response to the city's arguments went out today after being duly notarized. It's not nearly as polished as I would have liked.
In good news, my failure to contact the minister of Justice apparently won't be an issue, since the city's lawyer contacted them. She's doing a remarkable job given the case she's been given to argue.
As for the city's decision on not releasing bus stop locations, my request for review is being held up for some reason; I need to return the review office's call during normal Atlantic time.
I'm still in Las Vegas, Nevada where it was above 40 Celsius today. My plane is scheduled to land in Halifax at 10:30 PM July 3rd, just 11 hours before the case on district boundaries. I've heard from one friend that wants to attend this hearing, and I'll find out if people can attend. If you're interested, let me know by email or in the comments. |
|
|
| High Desert |
[Jun. 15th, 2006|09:31 am] |
Yesterday was spent in the high desert, including Joshua Tree National Park. It's amazing how this is technically a desert- it's hot, it barely rains, but there's a lot of life here.
Leaving for Vegas on Sunday, I'll get to talk to my cousin Michele. Funny how much can happen in 17 years, how relationships evolve and occasionally break down, how your second cousin that was in primary school is now going back to college.
Tuesday my uncle brought me to his weekly Rotary club meeting. I left very much impressed. This club is giving money to a GLBT center, even though I know several members are fairly close-minded. The breadth of issues considered was inspiring, and gave me some hope that they could be part of the solution for larger environmental issues. My uncle impressed on me that if I was going to go into business I should join such a service organization: he regularly uses the services of other members and also did a lot of business through them. The alternative, I suppose, is an old-boys network.
Ironically, following the Rotary meeting was a men's group meeting (not affiliated in any way with Rotary). My uncle and I disagree on many political issues, and here I was with several men in their 70's and 80's whom I assumed to be quite conservative as well. One of these men comments they do not admire Bush, another (conservative) retorts about 'Liberal Media' and I jump in. The Media are biased to the right, the liberals don't know their history and the hawks sound exactly like Al-Qaeda. My uncle is proud- we don't share the same perspective, but I manage to hold their attention and argue my case effectively.
Mentioning that France's education system doesn't teach students about Algeria seems to soften the blow as I argue that the US population is ignorant about the Middle East. We don't want to face our history, and we are condemned to repeat the same mistakes, at a great cost: in lives, finances and reputation. History books can get quite controversial, and maybe this is a good time for NGO's to look at those of countries like France, the UK, Australia, Canada, the USA, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and China. Maybe we need a survey for history like the National Geographic's to embarass governments into action? |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|